Case S5: Comparison of tooling for sputtering

​In the previous cases we analyzed a planar magnetron cathode coupled with two different fixture rotations: single-axis rotation and planetary rotation. Here we draw some comparison of the two. Taking the absolute thickness values (which are directly proportional to the deposition rates) and material-collection values from the output of V-Grade 5S we can create a comparison table for the two rotation methods, shown below. 
Get the Most out 
of Your Coaters
Hardware requirements
Request a Free Trial
© 2018 Tin Model LLC. All rights reserved. 
     With planetary rotation, the deposition rate is less than a third of that of the single-axis rotation (for a target operated under the same condition). In terms of throughput, however, the planetary setup has an edge over the single-axis rotation because of its quadrupled load capacity. 

     The material collection is, in fact, a reliable measure of throughput. Assuming both systems are fully loaded, the ratio of throughput between the planetary and single-axis is 25/21, not considering the time spent in pumping down. If pump-down is required between loads, the planetary rotation system should gain more in throughput. 

     In terms of thickness uniformity, the planetary-rotation system yields significantly better intrinsic uniformity. With properly designed and installed correction masks, both systems can produce coatings with uniformity around 0.2% or better. 

     The planetary-rotation system has another advantage if ultra-thin layers are to be deposited. The higher intrinsic uniformity (and the use of a slimmer mask) means the planetary system is more friendly to the deposition of ultra-thin layers. Please refer to "Get the most out of your coaters" for the drawback of employing correction masks. 

     These observations are known empirically to engineers. With V-Grade 5S we can gain a more precise knowledge through quantification. 
Case Studies with 
V-Grade 5 &
V-Grade 5S
View more cases